WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF
There is a difference between managing a smart city and being responsible for meeting the needs of that city’s residents and now AI is doing both.
When we talk about the future of cities everyone typically agrees they’re smart. And in the metaverse … Increasingly though more governments and people talk about these Smart Cities, such as Saudi Arabia’s $500 Billion megacity Neom, being run by Artificial Intelligence (AI). And now, taking this one step further, from robots making and delivering coffee to office chairs rearranging themselves after a meeting, a smart city project in China aims to put AI not just “in charge” but to put it in “full control of meeting users needs.”
Needless to say while the two points might not sound that different there’s actually a huge gulf between them. For example, with an AI simply “in control” it could just manage the city’s traffic lights, but an AI that “meets your needs” might know you’re late for work and tweak the traffic light schedules to give you all greens.
This is a simple example, but as you can see it’s a powerful example that shows the delta between the two. Now scale this up to cover every person in a city and every aspect of their lives and not only do you have a data privacy nightmare, with some great upsides, but you’ll also know why a lot of people at the conference raised eyebrows.
Danish architecture firm BIG and Chinese tech company Terminus discussed plans to build an AI-run campus style development in the southwestern Chinese city of Chongqing during an online panel at Web Summit, a global tech conference.
The project named Cloud Valley, plans to use sensors and WiFi connected devices to gather data on everything from weather and pollution to people’s eating habits to automatically meet residents’ needs, said Terminus founder Victor Ai.
“It’s almost coming back to this idea of living in a village where, when you show up, even though it’s the first time you’re there, the bar tender knows your favourite drink,” said BIG founding partner Bjarke Ingels.
“When our environment becomes sensing and sentient … we can really open up that kind of seamlessness because the AI can recognise people coming. So it can open the door, so they don’t have to look for their key cards.”
Cities around the world are racing to embrace technology in a bid to improve urban life by collecting data to address problems like traffic jams and crime.
More than 500 smart cities are being built across China, according to the government, to spur growth amidst a global economic downturn.
Launched in April, the Cloud Valley project envisions a city of about 13 million square foot – equal to some 200 football pitches – where technology allows people to live more comfortably by anticipating their needs.
“As sunlight hits the houses, bedroom windows adjust their opacity to allow the natural light to wake sleepy residents,” Terminus said on its website, which also highlights tranquil green spaces like rooftop gardens.
“Once the light has filled the room, an AI virtual housekeeper named Titan selects your breakfast, matches your outfit with the weather, and presents a full schedule of your day.”
The city, which includes offices, homes, public spaces and self-driving cars that move around under the ever watchful eye of AI, is due for completion in about three years, according to Terminus. Yet, like other smart cities, its tech-driven approach has raised privacy concerns.
“1984 here we go … sounds like a surveillance state,” Filipe Monteiro, a virtual attendee of the conference, wrote in the panel’s chat, referring to George Orwell’s dystopian novel where citizens are constantly surveilled by Big Brother.
“Isn’t all of this a little scary?” added Gonzalo Perez Paredes, another conference-goer.
Eva Blum-Dumontet, a senior researcher at British advocacy group Privacy International, said smart cities risked becoming a threat to human rights if companies and governments did not take steps to limit surveillance and ensure inclusivity.
“We need to ask, for instance, how the city will affect people who may not be tech literate,” she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation. “This risk is all the greater when there is not a legal framework limiting the access that governments can obtain over the data collected by private companies.”