Skip to main content
AskVantage

AI and intelligence

Google gave an AI intuition, then it drove a race car without being taught

Humans and animals learn many things intuitively, like walking, and now researchers have found a way to embody this same trait within AI.

Key takeaways

  • Animals are lucky, after all they’re born with innate abilities and predispositions.
  • For such a network, the network’s overall shape drives its intelligence, and could make it particularly well-suited to certain tasks.
  • On a task that involved recognising written digits these WANNs then went on to achieve greater than 90 percent accuracy, versus 99 percent for a larger network trained on the task.
Cite or link to this article

Griffin, M. (2020) 'Google gave an AI intuition, then it drove a race car without being taught', 311 Institute, 2 February. Available at: https://www.311institute.com/google-gave-an-ai-intuition-then-it-drove-a-race-car-without-being-taught/ (Accessed: 1 October 2026).

Animals are lucky, after all they’re born with innate abilities and predispositions. Horses can walk within hours of birth, ducks can swim soon after hatching, and human infants are automatically attracted to faces and innately know how to scream at parents, which is a wonderful gift as any parent will tell you.

Over time animal’s brains have evolved to take on the world with little or no experience, and so should come as little surprise that researchers would like to recreate such natural abilities in Artificial Intelligence (AI), as well as in the field of robotics where researchers are increasingly trying to tap into this phenomenon by creating the world’s first so called General Purpose Robots that don’t have to be taught to do specific things, they just observe the world around them and “pick up skills” as they go.

Now new research from Google has found that artificial neural networks can be given these same innate skills and evolve to perform tasks without learning, and the new technique could ultimately lead to AI that is much more adept at a wide variety of  straight off the bat, for example driving cars or even perhaps taking over the world and becoming an immortal dictator like Elon Musk recently discussed. But let’s forget the fun stuff for now and look at the science behind the breakthrough.

Artificial neural networks are arrangements of small computing elements, neurons, that pass information between them. The networks typically learn to perform tasks like playing games or recognising images by adjusting the “weights” or strengths of the connections between these neurons. A technique called neural architecture search tries lots of network shapes and sizes to find ones that learn better for a specific purpose.

The new method uses this same search technique to find networks for which the weights don’t matter. For such a network, the network’s overall shape drives its intelligence, and could make it particularly well-suited to certain tasks.

“If animals have all these innate behaviours, and some neural networks can do well without a lot of training, we wondered how far we could push that idea,” said Adam Gaier, a computer scientist who was the paper’s lead author while working at Google Brain.

The process begins with a set of very simple networks that link inputs, say  data from a robot’s sensors to behavioural outputs. It evaluates the nets’ performance on a given task, keeps the networks that performed best, and mutates them, by adding a neuron, adding a link, or changing how sensitive a neuron is to the sum of its inputs. In the evaluation phase, a shared random number is assigned to all of a network’s weights, this is actually done for several random numbers, and the results are averaged.

The results are called Weight Agnostic Neural Networks (WANNs). These networks get points for performing well on the task and also for being simple. While typical networks for the tasks in this study might have thousands of neurons and weights, the WANNs had only a handful of neurons and a single weight.

Somehow the WANNs still performed respectably. The research team compared them with standard network architectures whose weights were refined through experience to master three simulated tasks, for example, driving a race car, making a bipedal robot walk, and controlling a wheeled cart to balance a pole.

WANNs achieved scores ranging from about a sixth to half those of the neural networks that had been specifically trained to perform the tasks. When the researchers assigned the best-performing weight instead of a random one, those numbers ranged from two thirds to four fifths the trained nets’ scores. And if, after evolution, the WANNs were trained in the same way as the much larger standard networks, their performance was on par. And that is a breakthrough.

On a task that involved recognising written digits these WANNs then went on to achieve greater than 90 percent accuracy, versus 99 percent for a larger network trained on the task.

The research was presented last month at the Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) conference, in Vancouver, Canada.

“The fact that they make the whole thing work is very impressive,” said Rosanne Liu, a computer scientist at Uber AI Labs who was not involved with the research. Others have tried and failed to develop networks that don’t depend on weights. Gaier says the breakthrough was originally a bug that assigned the same number to all weights, which ended up simplifying the architecture search.

While the WANNs’ performance didn’t supersede that of larger trained networks the method opens a new pathway for finding network architectures specially adapted for various tasks, in the way that parts of the brain are wired differently for specific purposes. Convolutional neural networks, featuring an architecture catered for image recognition, mirror the structure of the brain’s visual cortex, for example, and now Gaier believes many more building blocks may be out there, ready to make AIs smart from birth. And that would be as scary as it is revolutionary.

311 Intelligence

What this means for your organisation

Structure can replace learning.

Arranging a network well gave it ability before any training. Nature does the same with innate behaviour. Expect systems that need far less task-specific data.

General purpose robots benefit.

Machines that pick up skills by observing need less instruction. That is the goal behind general purpose robots. Operators should watch for machines that arrive useful.

Evolution is the design tool.

The networks were evolved rather than hand-built or trained. Search replaces both design and training. Engineering teams should consider evolved architectures.

Three questions for your next leadership meeting

  1. Which of our tasks need systems that work without training?
  2. Could general purpose machines reduce our setup costs?
  3. Are we exploring evolved designs as well as trained ones?

The trends and technologies behind this story

From the 311 Starburst, the 311 Strategic Intelligence Unit’s map of the technologies and trends shaping the next 50 years.

Brief your board on AIA private briefing on what AI means for your organisation and what to do next. In person first, anywhere in the world.
Book a Briefing

Analysis by the 311 Strategic Intelligence Unit, from Matthew Griffin’s article and 311 data. First published on Fanatical Futurist.

FAQ

Why does this matter?

Humans and animals learn many things intuitively, like walking, and now researchers have found a way to embody this same trait within AI.

Matthew Griffin

About the author

Matthew Griffin Founder, President and Futurist, 311 Institute

Matthew Griffin is a multi-award winning Futurist and expert in Disruption and Innovation, Geopolitics, Leadership, and Technology, who NASA have described as a "walking encyclopaedia of the future" and a "futurist Polymath."

Read full bio

Matthew Griffin is a multi-award winning Futurist and expert in Disruption and Innovation, Geopolitics, Leadership, and Technology, who NASA have described as a "walking encyclopaedia of the future" and a "futurist Polymath." 17-time best selling author of the "Codex of the Future" series, Matthew is the Founder, President and Futurist of the 311 Institute, a global Futures and Deep Futures advisory firm working with royal households, world leaders, G7, G20, and G77 governments, NGOs, and multi-national mid and mega cap firms to help them explore, shape, and lead the next 50 years of business and society.

An award-winning YouTube creator with over a million followers, with an unrivalled global reach and impact, Matthew is a highly sought-after international keynote speaker, lecturer, and mentor who collaborates with global leaders through the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations (UNAOC) and United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) to shape pivotal initiatives such as the UN’s AI for Humanity program, the United Nations Conference of the Parties (UN COP), and the World Economic Forum in Davos.

As the former Global Head of Cloud, National Security, and Enterprise Sales for companies including Atos, Dell-EMC, and IBM, Matthew has a proven track record of building multi-billion dollar business units and turning failing divisions into market leaders. His ability to identify, analyse, and communicate the implications of hundreds of emerging technologies and trends is unparalleled, and his insights are trusted by many of the world’s most respected organisations, including ABB, Accenture, Adidas, AON, ARM, BCG, Centrica, Citi, Coca-Cola, Dentons, Deloitte, Dow Jones, EY, Google, KPMG, Lego, Legal & General, LinkedIn, Microsoft, PepsiCo, Qualcomm, RWE, Samsung, Siemens AG and Siemens Energy, T-Mobile, UBS, VISA, Walmart, Workday, Worldpay and many others.

Regularly featured in the global media including the AP, BBC, Bloomberg, CNBC, Discovery, Forbes, Khaleej Times, Telegraph, TIME, ViacomCBS, WIRED, and the WSJ, Matthews mission is to help organisations create a fair and sustainable future whose benefits are shared by everyone irrespective of their ability, background, or circumstances.

What future do you need to see?

Choose one to get started on AI and intelligence and the future of your organisation.

Where should Matthew reply?

Takes 30 seconds. No obligation. Matthew replies quickly. Privacy

Tag Cloud

Dossier opens the 311 Starburst dossier for that technology or trend.

Sources and further reading

  1. new research weightagnostic.github.io
  2. Adamgaier linkedin.com
  3. Brain research.google
  4. NeurIPS nips.cc
  5. Rosanne Liu rosanneliu.com
  6. Uber AI Labs uber.com

Source: first published by the 311 Institute on 2 February 2020. Cite as: Griffin, M. (2020). Google gave an AI intuition, then it drove a race car without being taught. 311 Institute. https://www.311institute.com/google-gave-an-ai-intuition-then-it-drove-a-race-car-without-being-taught/

You are welcome to quote this article with credit and a link to the original.

Book a Keynote