WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF
Genetically modifying organisms is easier than ever before, but controlling how those organisms behave or spread is a major problem still.
Love the Exponential Future? Join our XPotential Community, future proof yourself with courses from XPotential University, connect, watch a keynote, or browse my blog.
Genetically modified organisms, as well as entirely new synthetic organisms, hold a lot of promise for creating hardier crops that produce bigger yields, better beer, non-toxic fashion dyes, and more productive vaccine making chickens – as well as living military sensor networks … But in spite all this even the technology’s supporters are worried about genetically engineered organisms running wild, and for a while now they’ve been asking the question: “If a faster, better, stronger strain of bacteria (or dinosaur for Jurassic Park fans) escaped the lab, how would we stop it?” Now though scientists have come up with a new solution – Self-Destructing DNA.
Published in Nature Communications, the system would use cutting-edge gene-editing tools like CRISPR to erase DNA as soon as a given organism leaves its designated area, destroying both the cell and its genetic information. The result is a so-called “Genetic Kill Switch,” which would “eradicate any experimental or proprietary organisms before they can escape into the wild.”
As GMOs become more ambitious and widespread, researchers have grown increasingly interested in containment techniques. In February, a group of Harvard scientists published a kill-switch system that used amino acids toward the same end. Under that system, synthetic organisms would die without regular access to a specific amino acid, found only in the containment area. As a result, no cells would be able to survive long in the wild, cutting down the risk of an accidental release, as well as the inherent danger of creating and experimenting with new self-replicating organisms.
The system published today goes even further, targeting the DNA itself. Not only will the cells die, but the genetic information used to create them will be obliterated without a trace. That’s particularly useful for commercial GMOs, since companies treat their GMOs’ genes as trade secrets. The system is even precise enough to target specific portions of DNA, so a company could delete only the modified genes, leaving the others untouched.
“You can imagine, if you have an organism that has a bunch of modified genes that are proprietary,” says Christopher Voigt, an MIT bioengineer who worked on the study, ” just plugging in all the [genetic modifications] you want erased, and when the system is turned on it will erase that DNA and largely leave the other DNA in place.”
The new system achieves that precision through CRISPR, a gene-editing system that’s seen as one of the most exciting current developments in biotech. CRISPR is a collection of naturally occurring molecules that, when deployed right, can be used to cut out and replace sections of a cell’s DNA. Researchers have already used the system to modify living genes in humans and even edit the DNA of human embryos, generating significant controversy in bioethics circles.
The kill-switch system focuses on the DNA-removal part of CRISPR, deleting genes entirely rather than replacing them. Researchers tested out the system in a limited model, using E. coli bacteria and pre-established trigger mechanisms. If the test model came in contact with a specific sugar molecule called Arabinose, it would trigger the CRISPR system to delete a specified portion of the E. coli DNA, resulting in the death of the cell. It took roughly two hours for the triggers to kick in after the Arabinose was added, but after that, 99 percent of the cells were dead within 15 minutes.
The current version is only a proof of concept, and researchers expect more challenges as the system grows more complex. The Arabinose trigger was chosen because it works well in the lab, but a field-ready version of the system would likely have a much more complex trigger that could have more trouble producing reliable results.
Voigt said one possibility would be a system triggered by light, which would allow more aggressively modified organisms to be deployed in closed vats like fermenters. But, still, ensuring that light triggers the kill-switch as reliably as arabinose will require a lot more research.
“Putting it as part of a larger system is going to be key,” Voigt says, “one that’s able to respond to real environmental conditions.”